Short-term versus long-term shareholder objectives
Furthermore, if all shareholders only desire short term benefit, then speculative, growth and infrastructure stocks would not exist - and they do.
A discussion that universally categorises shareholders into one benefits camp over another is incorrect because we know from observation and research, that different shareholders want different outcomes and the same shareholder may require different benefits from different stocks. If that were not the case, then fund managers would be largely out of a job.
The only way to resolve the challenge of aligning the corporate endeavours with the desired outcomes of its owners is to establish its shareholder objectives (metrics) in quantifiable terms against the criteria of value, benefit, growth and risk. Management (and the board) are then judged on their ability to achieve those metrics - regardless of whether they are short, medium or long term.
Labels: long term, objectives, organisation, shareholders, short term
1 Comments :
The eurozone may compare well against the US and UK in terms of budget deficits, but sound public finances are about more than this. The picture is much bleaker when the debt stock, cost of borrowing and trend in nominal GDP are taken into account.
Dirk Kettlewell
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home